The functional test automation tool WinRunner the company Mercury is contained in a ranking of the ordinary. On the website www.dreckstool.de disgruntled user can take advantage of software tools, air their displeasure. WinRunner is currently ranked 77 of 143 software tools, with 68 reports (2004: 335, 2002: 110, first time in 2001: 33). A relatively high number in terms of penetration of the software with other tools such as Microsoft Outlook.
Where does this dissatisfaction usually so reliable and easy to use tools from Mercury? Is this excessive desire to requirements that were not met? Is it a Mißvertändnis, what tools can make this kind? Or is it because that test automation is at this level generally associated with difficulties and therefore necessarily specialists should be involved? Or is the survey is not representative enough? described
0 comments:
Post a Comment